While remaining convinced that the efficiencies and the three "e" (efficiency, effectiveness, cost) could be affordable to the target audience, rather than the need for private, let me just make a note on theme.
Custody "in house" by itself provides that there is an entity (public or public / private) to manage the first of custody to other (usually private and by invitation) the service.
service that is generally defragmented Areas through the establishment of best practices.
This institution (in house) was used, for example, in Emilia Romagna, as a safeguard, just to preserve the existing management (which already guaranteed the three "e") and then to prevent private companies or public / private (public utilities) in the neighboring regions (See Veneto) attack and could erode services and local capital.
Then the in-house by us would mean what? That the municipalities shall continue to manage the water cycle.
We are confident that the service offered by a myriad of communications presented characters of efficiency, effectiveness and economy? In this case the rate is not the only indicator appropriate to make comparisons. And is there a specific reason.
First, as is the case for waste, there are tax evaders and especially the flat-rate system. It is a basic inequality of the system. A system of tariff is based on commensurate the service or product. Then there are the guaranteed response times to outages. The public utilities are called Card Services. Have you read around some before and after Girgenti Waters?
I do not think.
Finally, and the thing I was most unusual about the reading of recent work on the theme: the position of our Mayor about the public nature of the operator of integrated water services.
Former President Cuffaro has used the "spa" (AtoRifiuti, Multiservice, Siciliaeservizi, Sicily water) to make the operations of political convenience (read recruitment) without switching pubblici concorsi. Ora rimane pur sempre vero che i pubblici concorsi potrebbero essere pilotati ma volete mettere con un assunzione per chiamata diretta?
In realtà, ed è questa la grave mancanza della sinistra ai tempi di Cuffaro, le società sopra ricordate rientrano pienamente nel novero delle società pubbliche e nessuna di loro avrebbe potuto effettuare assunzioni se non attraverso l’indizione di concorsi. Ma nessun deputato e nessuna minoranza ha avuto la forza ed il coraggio di denunciare ciò, soprattutto se questa prassi presentava la proporzione del
Gli unici concorsi pubblici che vengono effettuati da questi enti/società Sicily in the field of disability.
Why obliged by law to cover a certain percentage of staff with enjoying Ln68/99.
It 's the case, for example dell'ATOGESA AG2. Since 2007 have been published on the website of this company at least 3 calls for a number of 6 posts in the competition.
One is the recruitment of an engineer for the Environment and Territory, and was reserved (as provided for in article 1 of Law 68/99) to:
- people working age suffering from physical, mental or sensory and intellectual disabilities, resulting in a reduced capacity to work more than 45%, determined by the competent committees for the recognition of disability civil
- disabled persons of working with a degree of disability higher than 33% against 1'Assicurazione established by the National Institute for Occupational Accidents and Occupational Diseases (INAIL) pursuant to the provisions in force;
- war disabled persons, war invalids and disabled servicemen with disabilities ascribed from first to eighth category;
That competition has never been published in the Official Gazette and was done by direct recruitment from the employment office (ex-officio placement). The assumption is the 7th level. Obviously the assumption disabled.
I always wondered, especially after seeing other public notices, why has not traced the same path to assume the other five workers in concepts, level 5, and has preferred to publish the two Subsequent contests on the Official Gazette.
Strange no?
0 comments:
Post a Comment